The Death of Polaroid

I’ve spent a lot of time thinking the past few days about the recent announcement that Polaroid will be discontinuing their Instant Film format. I suppose it is hard for me to accept because it was one of those things that I trusted to always be there for me to explore more. I realize how naive and presumptuous this thought was. Truthfully, there wasn’t much thought about it before these past two weeks. It sounds silly to describe Polaroid as a cornerstone of my life that has now been removed, but it certainly represents that notion. It seems to represent a string of realizations (in m my life) lately that everything is fleeting. That’s a discussion for another day. In the grand scheme, Polaroid represents a small portion of all that is fleeting and important (or unimportant) in life, but it serves as a reminder none-the-less. (An irking, irritating, and unnecessary reminder.)

Polaroid represents what I love about art and photography. I believe experimentation, accidents, and unpredictability are important if not essential parts of the art making process. With Polaroid film you are guaranteed all three will occur at some point. I find that with digital photography I am lazy and expectant. It’s not that you cannot be experimental with digital photography: it’s just a lot more difficult. It’s difficult to make a mistake. Either that, or when you do experiment your results are predictable. In my opinion, the aesthetics of digital photography, especially experimental digital photography, will never compare to the images created with paper and chemicals.

Ultimately, I understand the decision made by Polaroid and decisions being made by film companies the world over. It is not profitable to make film anymore. If I could help support it by purchasing film and paper more, I would. I’m probably a fair sample of the consumer who is still interested in film and chemical processing. I would love to use only that. But, the fact is that I can’t afford it. I have a digital camera and a printer because it saves me hundreds of dollars a year. I hate to be a hypocrite, but at the same time, I refuse to believe that Polaroid cannot posses a corner in a niche market. I just hate to see an art form die. Are they going to stop making paint next? Pencils, maybe? (I heard pens are the new pencil..)

In an effort to garner some attention to the “niche market,” if one exists, and I believe strongly that it does, I have created a website- www.savethepolaroid.com. The website will be a hub for news from Polaroid and other corporations with options to pick up the Polaroid Instant Film format. To start, I am trying to gain support through photographers and Polaroid enthusiasts. The website provides the option to send pictures to Polaroid Corp. to express disappointment and representation for the existing market. Polaroid will not overturn its decision to stop making instant film. However, enough vocalization may be just what the art form needs to survive. Polaroid is interested in selling the technology, if only there is a buyer. Join the effort- www.savethepolaroid.com.

Posted February 22, 2008 12:02 am { }

4 Comments

  1. good luck girlie….

    Comment by stephanie s | 7:54 am February 22, 2008

  2. I’ve been behind many curves in my day, but the Polaroid curve is the one I’ve been most frustrated by. I bought my first SX-70 a week before Polaroid announced they were discontinuing Time-Zero; and I’ve only recently acquired two working pack film cameras (a 103, I think, and more recently a lovely 350), and here comes Polaroid to throw another bucket of tepid water on me. Have started laying in 667 and 669 already. Also 600 for impulsive shots with the Polaroid Impulse.

    Meantime, I’m guessing that the anoxically overpriced Polaroid Blend will be gone too, and the unexpected resurrection of our SX-70s will prove to be temporary after all. Maybe all the “Save the Polaroid” sites could include action on reviving a real Time-Zero equivalent.

    I don’t have any experience with the Fuji instant films, so I don’t know how the image quality will compare to the one you get from Polaroid’s magic chemistry. I suspect, however, that it will just not be exactly the same. I was somewhat heartened to see that they make ISO equivalents for the Polaroid pack films, including a 3000 B&W.

    Any upside to all of this? If selling one’s Polaroid photos is an issue, they may be worth more to potential buyers. But then, I don’t photograph to make money. I like making interesting pictures.

    Comment by Mark Satola | 6:39 am March 18, 2008

  3. Hey,

    Ive been having sleepless nights, and dreams about secret warehouses full of Type 55…..As you so rightly say, this tragic (are we over reacting??) situation is really indicative of the transience of all things, and the human traits of wanting to improve and change things that aint broke!? Im off to have another cry under my sheets now……
    Nite
    Richard x

    Comment by Richard Wright | 5:28 pm April 8, 2008

  4. you guys need to buy that stuff up NOW! stockpile it and then sell it to all the polaroid junkies at 1000% markup! wooo!

    Comment by ben parsons | 6:57 pm May 15, 2008

Leave a comment

  1. About
    Name: Jamie Bayliss Location: Seattle, WA

    art. photographs. writing. reading. notes. music. scraps. musings. memories. dreams. creativity. love. secrets. experiment. wonder. stories. inspiration.

  2. Archives





  3. Widget_logo
Fragment jamiebayliss.com